State/Jurisdiction: D & M Pelle Holdings Pty Ltd v Cottrell Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005]…
Hayley Lewis Swim School vs Lend Lease Real Estate
State/Jurisdiction:
Did not go to court (Potential Tribunal/Supreme Court).
Complexity: 7.0/10
Parties to Dispute:
Taytom Pty Ltd, trading as Hayley Lewis Swim School vs Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Limited and Westfield Management Limited both represented by major law firms.
Instruction:
Undertake forensic evaluation from business records (Annual Financial Statements) to provide opinion of losses.
Type of Dispute:
Unintended misrepresentation. High profile former Olympian and major A-REIT.
Description of Dispute:
Unintended misrepresentation;
- Consequential breach of quiet use;
- Plus potential damage to personal “brand”, beyond lease term plus damage to passive income, i.e. product endorsements, etc. had not been considered law firm.
How Settled:
Potential for major claim with adverse publicity, etc.
Expert’s report was the sole opinion. to settle dispute without legal representatives. Legal representatives used to draw up “settlement contract”.
Comments:
Confidentially the Respondents national representative complimented single expert’s report for being extremely through and clear. Losses within lease term $220,000, loss to personal brand $950,000 beyond lease term.